Sub Conscious Learning System

I had a thought, today. It was for a type of learning which seemed quite natural, but I had not even imagined being able to implement, previously. It is a system for self-scoring. As you might know, in general evolutionary algorithms, a computer program is given a score based on how well it functions, and it's children carry on that score, and build onto it. Eventually, after many generations, it gets smarter and smarter. However, with this system, if forces the entire species to lean as a whole, rather then individually. This works perfectly fine if the algorithm is designed to only master a single task, even if it's complex. But what about more complex tasks?

How could an artificial intelligence agent be designed, so that it can make it's own choices. Score it's own actions and abilities. This is an important trait for agents who want to have any hope in thriving in a complex environment, where more then a single action must be scored. This is a critical base for higher level thinking machines. Machines that learn strategy, and can plan out actions ahead of time. Taking into consideration events which only they specifically have encountered, not their previous generations.

Here is my proposal. For this system, the original generation based learning algorithm is still in place. This judges actions solely around things such as survival of the individual, and expanding the population. But there is also another learning system in play, here. The second learning system is per agent, and effects only their brain. This is constantly updating, as well.

In this system, imagine we have an entire AI brain network. Neurons and all. Now, take a chunk of it. Say, 25% or so, and mark this as the subconscious. This part is unable to be edited by the agent. In addition, this chunk is close to the end or the network, and all linked together closely. Yes, there are many connections going in, and also several going out. Though, in the middle of these, there are "emotion" neurons. These release emotional responses based on their input. Positive input, results in a positive output. Negative input, results in a negative output. Highly positive input, results in a highly positive output. And so on. Now, these emotional responses are the "score" values for the agent. It wants these to be as high as possible. So it is constantly weighing in different neuron values for the rest of the brain to try to influence the emotions. Now, the main evolutionary algorithm still wants the brain to function a certain way, to accomplish it's overall tasks. Survive, and thrive.

When a new agent is born, it's default brain state is given to it by the evolutionary algorithm. It also decides which parts of the brain are editable, or not. (This network is also assuming the same setup as the one I described in my article "Smoother Node Map Learning".)

By doing it this way, the agent is allowed to learn and adapt to it's environment at it's own pace, while the main algorithm gives a general path for everyone to follow. Both algorithms fight each other, and also work together to achieve a goal.

As each agent is it's own brain, and learning path, each one will have it's own personality, goals, and so on. Each will behave in their own way, but still follow the same overall instincts given to them when they are born.

I am quite excited to see how this plays out, so I will be playing with the code for it. (Though most likely I'll just get lazy and never finish it, as is the case for most of these ideas.)

Node Map Learning

Artificial Intelligence is an amazing topic. The whole concept of a computer program learning about it's environment and adapting to it is amazing. I've always loved AI, and have made many attempts to reproduce it. Though I have run into numerous problems along the way. Mostly due towards my lack of knowledge on the subject, and because of the ridiculous amount of work involved to make such a program. Though this is to be expected. AI is not a simple subject. There's so much involved in it, that it's almost necessary to use large teams to design anything of a decent scale. Though it can be done. So why don't we have AI around us commonly if it possible? Well, in a small sense we do. Neural Networks for example, are used at banks to help read off hand writing into computer text, and can do so with over 99% accuracy. But this isn't the type of machine learning I am referring to. What about emotions? Self set goals? These things are possible, and have been created in several instances. But the design behind them almost seem primitive compared to even small animals. This is because even though we have many different algorithms to aid in machine learning, they all have one thing in common. They are slow. It will often take many, many, many passes before the computer finally gets anywhere logical. Yes, in a sense the human mind is the same way, taking the first several years of our lives to learn about how to interact with the world around us. But we can't wait that long. For a computer, an environment on a scale such as ours would take almost centuries to understand, and lots of storage space. Not to mention a ridiculous CPU to calculate decisions in real time. Resources we don't have to spare. That's why AI is such a largely studied field. It's constantly coming up with new ways to speed things up, and make it more efficient. That's why I'm here. I proposing a new type of learning method which I hope will make learning on a mass scale much easier. Though I do not fully understand every part of the algorithm yet, I hope to keep fleshing it out more and more over time. This information right here is a basic summary of the algorithm, rather then any detailed math behind it.


The Node Map Learning method is machine learning concept which is hopefully better at understanding much larger and more complex environments then regular algorithms such as Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms. It works by basically creating it's very own node map, (which functions similar to a program's code, shown right) then filling this node map with many, many functions. Anything that can be given to it. This includes stuff like distance between two points, sorting a list, adding numbers, and of course, actual functions for interacting with the environments. The AI takes all this data, and tries to organize it into a complex tree of data processing to work with such. The tree is constantly changing and evolving. Some of the functions given to the AI might be things such as Neural Networks or Genetic Algorithms, in which case it would also use these functions, and as the AI operated, would also learn to make better use of these functions. One last thing to note, is that each limb of the tree, (the data that comes out of functions, and gets thrown into other ones) must have a "type" assigned to it. Such as "number". This means that a function which accepts 1 input in the form of a number can only accept data that is assigned as a type of number. Data types can extend other data types. Such as "integer" would extend "number". Thus, all integers can be used as numbers, but not all numbers can be used as integers. The tree grows constantly as well, becoming more and more complex as needed. This process occurs in a similar method to genetic algorithms. The AI will semi-randomly (see paragraph below) start testing out different tree designs by adding, removing, or replacing branches on the tree. If the new design functions better, use that tree instead. If not, revert to previous tree. This process continues infinity, until there is absolutely no better way of designing the tree, without completely remaking it.

It chooses a base design by randomly creating X number of completely random tree designs initially. (X is determined by the complexity of the environment, though is usually around 100 or so. Though can be much higher for intricate environments.) Then it tests all X concepts, and looks for patterns in each one, and compares these patterns to how well it did. For example, the AI may test 250 designs, and looking at the designs, trees the used the pattern "Function 1 > Function 2 > Function 3 and 4" tended to have better results, while trees that use the pattern "Function 1 > Function 4" seemed to function very poorly. Taking all the patterns into account, it designs a new tree a sees how it functions. Constantly testing it, changing it, and making it better. Each and every new tree that is tested is broken down into a list of patterns and given a numerical value based on how well it functioned. This builds up after a while, and eventually will give the AI a very clear idea of what kind of designs work better then others.

This is my concept. I hope to have a working proof of concept out later. Thanks for taking the time to read this, and follow to keep updated. I will be posting more on the subject soon.